[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: mouse performance
- To: <micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk>
- Subject: RE: mouse performance
- From: "Daniel Chia" <danstryder01@yahoo.com.sg>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:41:25 +0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.sg; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:In-Reply-To:Importance; b=zcvk6zLNl1gApVYtsuA/uVS1kJYG5dgsKHH+eGPiywCTL8iijM0SC54nBb6YOWGXRSr+ZRsvqtVS8vWcZ2BTPbAOIilxNx8BcN0yuTt6TkNhzynPCttNsGP3OQvK3fcBHslL694I2C9mP3/ULH/n00TYXrKQiXr/2mODiKao84w= ;
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <42E3C58D.1060405@ntlworld.com>
- Reply-to: micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk
- Sender: owner-micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk
Hi,
Actually I think it was mentioned before that cornering speed is
also quite an important factor when it comes to deciding the speed of a
mouse, since a mouse does corner frequently and having a higher average
speed is greatly facilitated by turn speed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Chia
"Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent
perspiration."
- Thomas Edison
E-mail: danielcjh@yahoo.com.sg
MSN: danstryder01@yahoo.com.sg
ICQ: 37878331
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk
[mailto:owner-micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk]
> On Behalf Of Peter Harrison
> Sent: 25 July 2005 00:45
> To: micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk
> Subject: mouse performance
>
> I don't think there is a single source of mouse performance data
> although there are a couple with records of precious competitions.
These
> times are, of course heavily dependant upon the actual maze.
>
> I have found data for a couple of mice on the net (you may need to
mess
> with your font settings to see this neatly) :
>
> Name Ning 2 Min2 Min3 MM3
> owner Ng Beng Kiat Ng Beng Kiat Ng Beng Kiat Itani
> length mm 122 117 113
130
> width mm 80 75 74 60
> height mm 70 50 41
52
> mass g 713 332 290 350
> speed m/s 2.5 2 2.1 2.6
> accn m/s/s 2.5 2.5 2.8 3.2
>
> For what it is worth, Maximus (you remember - knocks down walls and
> crashed a lot) was set for an acceleration 2.8 m/s/s and a top speed
of
> 2 m/s.
>
> It is clear from the table above that a mouse that can handle
> consistently at 3 and 3 would be in with a good chance against most
> competition.
>
> All the above mice can accelerate much harder and travel much faster.
I
> believe these are the actual running settings used.
>
> If anyone else would like to share their performance data, I am sure
we
> would all be interested. It is good to know what you have to achieve
to
> be in with a chance. Now, controlling all that power....
>
> The only common test I have come across on the Japanese sites is a
full
> circuit around the outside of the maze. The simplest way to set this
up
> would be to time the mouse between subsequent passes through the start
> gate, having removed the east wall from the start cell. Mice would
then
> just need to be told to do a simple set of moves. I have asked Tony if
> we can have such an event at the proposed semi-formal autumn/winter
> event at TIC. We are looking at the end of November I think. More
> details from Tony if we can go ahead with this. I have a video
somewhere
> of a stepper driven mouse doing this in under 10 seconds and I think 6
> seconds would be a fair goal for a mouse accelerating at 3m/s/s.
>
> As for how useful it is, well the ability to steer at speed is fairly
> critical and it is a simple, easy to set up task. Any well-defined,
> repeatable task would be interesting as a year-on-year comparison of
> performance. I have been unable to find published data for this
although
> I am sure it exists somewhere. It may also be a good crowd-pleaser at
a
> competition.
>
> Pete Harrison
Send instant messages to your online friends http://asia.messenger.yahoo.com