Re: mouse performance

To: micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk
Subject: Re: mouse performance
From: Peter Harrison <peter_harrison@ntlworld.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:02:46 +0100
In-reply-to: <42E3C58D.1060405@ntlworld.com>
References: <Pine.OSF.4.58.0507070949290.21849@sartre.cs.rhul.ac.uk> <6.0.3.0.1.20050723113412.0225f4b8@mailgate.ftech.net> <42E3C58D.1060405@ntlworld.com>
Reply-to: micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk
Sender: owner-micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

Hmm

Poor arithmetic - 6 seconds would be pretty damned impressive.

Probably 9 seconds would be a bit more realistic as an ultimate goal 
with 12 seconds being quite good.

Pete Harrison

References:
- (Resent for jerry: original header too long)
  - From: A Johnstone <adrian@cs.rhul.ac.uk>
- Re: mailing list
  - From: Duncan Louttit <duncan@swallow.co.uk>
- mouse performance
  - From: Peter Harrison <peter_harrison@ntlworld.com>

Prev: mouse performance
Next: RE: mouse performance
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread