I also think that the non contact event was well worth running! The disciplines involved considerably different. We do need to sort the rules out! Maybe we could also specify that non contacts need to demonstrate that they know they are at the centre. This would make them much more able to be converted to full solvers later on. I also agree that the wobbly wall idea is probably the best we can manage to detect if they hit the wall I don't think hitting the wall should necessarily put them in last place. Derek _____ From: owner-micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk [mailto:owner-micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tony Wilcox Sent: 16 July 2004 18:15 To: micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk Subject: RE: Non Contact wall followers Hi Ken and all Do you think that the separate competition for non-contact followers was a good idea? Should it continue? Tony -----Original Message----- From: owner-micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk on behalf of Ken Hewitt Sent: Fri 7/16/2004 10:28 AM To: micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk Cc: Subject: Non Contact wall followers As TIC had a separate compition for Non Contact wall followers I think this is the main area where the rules need changing as they are not covered by the existing wall follower rules. Ken. +-----------------------------+--------------------------------------------+ | Ken Hewitt G8PWC/M3PWC | Email ken@welwyn.demon.co.uk | | \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ | Homepage http://www.welwyn.demon.co.uk | +-----------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>