Re: Wheel encoders and other things

To: micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Wheel encoders and other things
From: David Otten <otten@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:09:51 -0400
In-reply-to: <006701c45f70$4eb04fd0$6501a8c0@Dan>
References: <GKEBKPBIFEHDPJGFEDEEKEGHCOAA.frdchang@uclink4.berkeley.edu><5.2.1.1.2.20040701085958.04e40ec0@po10.mit.edu>
Reply-to: micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk
Sender: owner-micromouse@cs.rhul.ac.uk

I believe that the thickness of the film was 0.010" thick but it may have 
been as thin as 0.007".  The disks are horizontal on the mouse but seem to 
be stiff enough.  They are only 1" in diameter.

At 09:35 PM 7/1/04 +0800, you wrote:
>Ah ic, rather clever...
>
>May I ask, what is the thickness of the photo film? What i am cocerned about
>is the film not being able to stand by itself well...
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Daniel Chia

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rules
  - From: Duncan Louttit <duncan@swallow.co.uk>

References:
- RE: Wheel encoders
  - From: "frederick chang" <frdchang@uclink4.berkeley.edu>
- RE: Wheel encoders and other things
  - From: David Otten <otten@mit.edu>
- Re: Wheel encoders and other things
  - From: "Daniel Chia" <danstryder01@yahoo.com.sg>

Prev: Re: Information
Next: Optical Sensors and Post Slots
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread