Re: "standard" maze

• To: "Peter Harrison" <petenews@cctc.demon.co.uk>, <micromouse@dcs.rhbnc.ac.uk>
• Subject: Re: "standard" maze
• From: "Edmund Stephen-Smith" <edmund@stephen-smith.org>
• Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 21:01:55 +0100
• References: <E13o2cI-0001T1-00@relay4.ftech.net><Pine.OSF.4.21.0010241321230.10935-100000@platon.cs.rhbnc.ac.uk> <RYFN8nAAUJ+5Ew$A@cctc.demon.co.uk>

In addition to the collision possibility, this would violate the "goal is 7
walls and one entrance" rule (at least, I think it's a rule!).

Edmund.

----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Harrison <pete@cctc.demon.co.uk>
To: <micromouse@dcs.rhbnc.ac.uk>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: "standard" maze


> Hmm
>
> You could build two or four identical but challenging (multi route etc)
> mazes in one arena. These would be symmetrical copies which only join at
> the centre.
>
> Mice could race the maze simultaneously for a bit of extra excitement.
> This would work for wall-followers just as well. However slow and
> unreliable the mice, there would be a certain tension so long as they
> were fairly evenly matched.
>
>
> >
>
> Peter Harrison
> http://www.cannock.ac.uk/~peteh

• "standard" maze
• From: Duncan Louttit <Duncan@swallow.co.uk>
• Re: "standard" maze
• From: Wayne Allen <wayne@dcs.rhbnc.ac.uk>
• Re: "standard" maze
• From: Peter Harrison <pete@cctc.demon.co.uk>

• Prev: Standard Route Maze
• Next: "Standard" maze
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread