[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: "standard" maze



Hi

While it is a bit more tedious to draw by hand, I find this is a better
representation (assuming a fixed pitch font). It has a better
'squareness' and prints up nicely.

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |     |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+  +  +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |     |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+



In article <E13nQ42-00060S-00@relay3.ftech.net>, Duncan Louttit
<Duncan@swallow.co.uk> writes
>
>        I think that the simplest maze that all current mice can run looks
>something like this:
> 
>                       - -
>                      |   |
>         - - - - - - -     
>        |                 |
>           - - - - - - - - 
>        | |
>           
>        | |
>           
>        | |
>           
>        | |
>           
>        | |
>           
>        | |
>           
>        | |
>         - 
>
>        The question is, what has to be added to this to make it
>sufficiently challenging?

Challenging for what? I guess it depends what you want to test. you
might include:

- two, equidistant routes
- two routes of different lengths
- two routes of the same length but different twistiness
- at least one dead end
- a loop
- no hope for wall followers
- a long run with only posts for guidance
- make sure you have to run over a nasty bump in the floor :)

Perhaps you could say a little more about what you have in mind?
Peter Harrison
http://www.cannock.ac.uk/~peteh

Follow-Ups: References: